December 17, 2016
"Information
Clearing House"
- I try my best to be an informed about what is, and has
happened, in Syria. When I watch mainstream media’s
coverage I am horrified at their “Fake News”. For
example, Lester Holt of NBC nightly news recently
referred to Bashar Assad as the “brutal dictator”. Does
Lester know that in 2014 there was a multiparty election
in Syria? Does he know that Assad won the election with
88% of the vote? Critics might say, but it was not a
fair election! Was ours?
Most of the coverage has centered around Aleppo, and the
mainstream Aleppo narrative has been, it was besieged by
the brutal dictator, who wanted to slaughter all the
residents of Aleppo. The fact is, Aleppo is divided into
two parts and has been for four years. West Aleppo is
controlled by the Syrian government, and East Aleppo was
captured, and has been held by terrorists and thugs for
the past four years. Residents of East Aleppo have not
been allowed to leave, and have been shot in the streets
for trying. The jihadists who control East Aleppo, these
would be the same “moderates” and “rebels” that beheaded
the 9-year-old boy, and showed the beheading to the
world, have also controlled the hospitals in east Aleppo
and have used them to treat their own, and to launch
artillery barrages into west Aleppo, killing innocents
every day for the past four years.
Finally, with the help of the Russians and others, the
Syrian government liberated East Aleppo and rescued its’
resident from the terrorists. This is a completely
different narrative from what one gets watching
mainstream news, which gets its news from “anonymous”
twitter accounts, “unnamed activists”, and the White
Helmets. That fake organization is funded by the US,
France, and other western nations to the tune of $100
million, and is nothing more than a propaganda tool for
the west. It has been completely exposed and thoroughly
discredited, except by mainstream media, which uses its
propaganda as if it were factual. The US had no actual
reporters anywhere near Aleppo. There are however,
reporters from other countries who were in and out of
Aleppo daily, like Vanessa Beeley and Canadian
journalist Eva Bartlett, who fully understand what has
happened and report it accordingly. If your goal is
trying to defeat the terrorist and jihadists forces in
Syria, the liberation of east Aleppo is a major victory.
If, on the other hand, you support terrorists, or have
as your goal, prolonging the war to weaken Assad, then
the taking of Aleppo represents a tragedy. According to
mainstream media, the retaking of Aleppo by government
forces and defeating the terrorist is a tragedy.
One of the best journalists in the world, when it comes
to the middle east, is Patrick Cockburn. You probably
never heard of him if you rely on mainstream “fake”
media, because his voice is not allowed. He is however,
recognized as one of the best sources in the world on
Syria and the Middle East, but his voice and work cannot
get by the censors of mainstream media. Cockburn’s most
recent article: “There’s More Propaganda Than News
Coming Out of Aleppo This Week” argues that jihadists
early on, killed or captured western journalists, and
gained the narrative using fake sources, twitter
accounts and the like. When is the last time you heard
Noam Chomsky on mainstream media? He is one of the best
minds in the country, but he cannot get by the censors.
Other great foreign policy journalists such as Eric
Margolis, Pepe Escobar, the great Glenn Greenwald, and
Jeremy Scahill, are not tolerated by mainstream “fake”
media.
It is interesting to see mainstream media shed crocodile
tears for the civilians of Aleppo, yet when the US
besieged the city of Fallujah in Iraq in 2004, the
“fake” news folks were cheerleaders. This was a city of
300,000, which was basically leveled by the US led
forces. The US claimed Fallujah was held by terrorists
and proceeded to level the city to save the city. No one
knows, nor will ever know, how many civilians were
killed in a brutal assault on a civilian city. The point
here is, mainstream “fake” news acted as cheerleaders,
and never once worried about civilians being
slaughtered, nor did they shed any tears during the
“Shock and Awe” destruction of Baghdad. Funny how they
can just turn around and shed crocodile tears for the
civilians of Aleppo, but cheer when we kill civilians.
In no way am I a champion of Bashar Assad, but I respect
the right of the Syrian people to pick their own leader.
How many times have you heard Obama and officials in the
administration, along with crazies like John McCain and
Lindsey Graham, chant in unison: “Assad must go”. None
of the crazies ever tried to explain what gives the US
government the legal right to decide who should lead the
Syrian people. Then again, what is the law, when you
have power. Still, it is interesting to see how upset
and angry these same folks are, when Russia is falsely
accused of trying to hack into our elections. Julian
Assange and Craig Murray claim them never got anything
from Russia, and they know who leaked the e-mails.
Former ambassador Craig Murray, even claims to have met
the individual, and insists the individual is an
insider. William Binney, the man who designed the NSA’s
surveillance system, has come forward and vehemently
argued if anyone hacked those e-mails, the NSA would
instantly know who hacked, when, where, and whether
those e-mails were passed on to another party. Binney,
the foremost expert in the world, is banned from
mainstream “fake” media, as are Murray and Assange. They
cannot get over the wall of censors who wish always to
control the narrative.
If you really are curious about world events, you must
work at it, and find good alternative sources. You are
ignorant of world events if you only rely on mainstream
“fake” media.
Journalists face off over Syria news sources
The views
expressed in this article are the author's own and do
not necessarily reflect Information Clearing House
editorial policy.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)