CIA's Russia
Hacking Claims Dismissed as 'Bulls***' Former UK
Ambassador
'I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked
them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an
insider. It’s a leak, not a hack'
By Belfast Telegraph
December 15, 2016
"Information
Clearing House"
- "Belfast
Telegraph"
- Craig Murray, the former UK
ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of
WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange, has dismissed the CIA's
claims that Russia interfered in last month’s
presidential election as "bulls***".
On Friday the Washington Post reported on a secret
assessment by the CIA, which concluded that Russian
intelligence hacked the Democratic National Committee's
servers and that of Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman
John Podesta, specifically to help Trump win the
presidency.
Mr Murray said: "I know who leaked them. I’ve met the
person who leaked them, and they are certainly not
Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack;
the two are different things.
“If what the CIA are saying is true, and the CIA’s
statement refers to people who are known to be linked to
the Russian state, they would have arrested someone if
it was someone inside the United States.
“America has not been shy about arresting
whistleblowers and it’s not been shy about extraditing
hackers. They plainly have no knowledge whatsoever.”
The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations
while Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks
were not linked to Russia.
The claims also drew a rebuke from Trump’s transition
team, which said in a statement: "These are the same
people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass
destruction."
Meanwhile US President-elect Donald Trump called the
CIA's assessment "ridiculous".
“Can you imagine if the election results were the
opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It
would be called conspiracy theory!” Trump tweeted on
Monday morning.
Can you imagine if the
election results were the opposite and WE tried
to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called
conspiracy theory!
Mr Trump rejected the CIA's conclusion that Russia
tried to interfere with the presidential election and
blamed "very embarrassed" Democrats for the public
release of the assessment. The Washington Post first
reported the CIA finding on Friday.
"It's ridiculous," Mr Trump said of the CIA's
assessment. He added, however, that he does not
necessarily oppose President Barack Obama's order for a
review of campaign-season hacking. "If you're going to
do that, I think you should not just say 'Russia'. You
should say other countries also, and maybe other
individuals."
The White House has said the probe would focus on any
breaches by other countries, and past elections.
Intelligence assessments
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI),
which oversees the 17 agency-strong US intelligence
community, has not embraced the CIA's assessment,
sources have told Reuters.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, whose standards
require it to make cases that can stand up in court,
also declined to accept the CIA's analysis.
In an angry letter sent to ODNI chief James Clapper
on Monday, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin
Nunes said he was “dismayed” that the top US
intelligence official had not informed the panel of the
CIA's analysis and the difference between its judgment
and the FBI’s assessment, Reuters reported.
"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong,
only that they can't prove intent," one of the officials
told the news agency. "Of course they can't, absent
agents in on the decision-making in Moscow.”
The ODNI was formed after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
'Thin reed'
“[It was] a thin reed upon which to base an
analytical judgment,” another official said in response
to the speculation. He stressed that the “judgment based
on the fact that Russian entities hacked both Democrats
and Republicans and only the Democratic information was
leaked.”
Republican Senator John McCain said on Monday there
was "no information" that Russian hacking of US
political organisations was aimed at influencing the
election.
"It's obvious that the Russians hacked into our
campaigns," McCain said told Reuters.
"But there is no information that they were intending
to affect the outcome of our election and that's why we
need a congressional investigation."
Daily briefings
Mr Trump has said that he is not interested in
getting daily intelligence briefings - an unprecedented
rejection of the nation's massive and sophisticated
intelligence apparatus.
The president-elect's remarks come as key
congressional Republicans joined Democrats in demanding
a bi-partisan investigation into the Kremlin's
activities and questioned consideration of Exxon Mobil
CEO Rex Tillerson - who has close business ties with
Moscow - as head of the State Department.
Asked whether
he is rejecting valuable intelligence on Fox News
Sunday, Mr Trump was defiant.
"I get it when
I need it," he said of the top-secret briefings
sessions, adding that he is leaving it up to the
briefers to decide when a development represents a
"change" big enough to notify him. "I don't have to be
told the same thing in the same words every single day
for the next eight years."
The CIA has
concluded with "high confidence" that Russia sought to
influence the US election on behalf of Mr Trump. The
finding alarmed legislators, including Senate Armed
Services Committee Chairman McCain who said he planned
to put senator Lindsay Graham, a staunch critic of Mr
Trump, in charge of investigating the claim.
Mr McCain has
vowed to scrutinise Mr Tillerson's business relationship
with Russia President Vladimir Putin, if Mr Tillerson is
nominated. Exxon steadily expanded its Russian business
on his watch even as its rivals faced expropriation and
regulatory obstacles. In 2013, Mr Putin bestowed the
Order of Friendship on Mr Tillerson.
"Maybe those
ties are strictly commercial and got to do with his
business in the oil business. Fine," Mr McCain said.
"And "we'll give him a fair hearing. But is it a matter
of concern? Certainly it should be a matter of concern."
Mr McCain was
not alone, raising questions about whether there would
be enough of a backlash to sink a nomination for Mr
Tillerson.
"Being a
'friend of Vladimir' is not an attribute I am hoping for
from a #SecretaryOfState," tweeted Florida Republican
senator Marco Rubio, Mr Trump's former campaign rival
and a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Pennsylvania
Democratic senator Bob Casey said the developments
"raise serious questions about whether the incoming
administration will adequately stand up to Russia's
aggression."
Mr Trump said
Mr Tillerson's relationship with Moscow was a selling
point.
"A great
advantage is he knows many of the players, and he knows
them well. He does massive deals in Russia. He does
massive deals for the company," Mr Trump told Fox News
in an interview broadcast on Sunday. Senate Foreign
Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker is impressive,
and former bitter rival Mitt Romney is still in the mix,
Mr Trump added.
"These are all
very different types of people," he said. "But when you
ask me about Rex, I mean, he's a world-class player.
There's no question about it."
Mr Trump's
incoming chief of staff, Reince Priebus, said Mr
Tillerson's nomination is not a done deal but shrugged
off allegations that Russia helped Mr Trump win.
He said: "The
Russians didn't tell Clinton to ignore Wisconsin and
Michigan," two states she was expected to win that went
instead for Mr Trump.
"She lost the
election because her ideas were bad. She didn't fit the
electorate. She ignored states that she shouldn't have
and Donald Trump was the change agent," Mr Priebus said.
Mr Trump's win, he added, "had nothing to do with the
Russians".
On other
matters, Mr Trump said he is leaving his worldwide
business empire to his executives and children, vowing,
that he will "have nothing to do with management". He is
expected to discuss the arrangement at a news conference
on Thursday.
He also said he
is "studying" the Paris climate agreement to reduce
carbon emissions. But he does not want the agreement to
put the US "at a competitive disadvantage with other
countries".
Craig Murray: DNC,
Podesta emails leaked by Americans, not hacked by
Russia
Craig Murray,
former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan and
whistleblower, discusses
his article claiming the DNC and Podesta emails
came from U.S., not Russian, sources.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)